Christian Priests, Hindu Pandas and Muslim Mullahs will rule all the conservative sluts, all the conservative TV Ass-es, cinema Ass-es, conservative journalistic Ass-es, artistic ass-es who are claiming themselves to be most loyal to the market.  These cultural and intellectual submissive bitches themselves demand “Be a nice looking good  conservative “.  Pulp writers like Chetan Bhagat gets high rank in this bourgeoisie conservatism attacking Salman Rushdie whose  discourse on writing is considered to be path breaking in English literature.  Conservatives are singing market tune with their conservatism  as if entire modernist movement, still considered  to be the most creative and productive moment in history were devoid of market! What Conservatives can produce for the market except pulp and porn! How to transcend, invoke and produce a phantom  at the limit of sense perception is not a business of conservative good sense rats  who never transcend earth, it is creative people’s business.  creating is a pure event, it can’t be a spetiotemporal realization according to the fixed bourgeoisie sense status. Creativity is an event and it is itself a sense rather sense of the all Sense, it belongs to language alone; it can’t be the subject of flat bourgeoisie sense and perception . Creative people create their own world, what occurs in it is valuable than any spiritualist’s and Mullah’s sense whatsoever kind it is. Sublime expressions are beyond intentionalities, it exhausts itself in expressing and meanwhile if it negates Muhammad’s sense of the sense or sense of the world it must be recognized spiritual than Mohammad’s Koranik spiritual sense.

We do not know yet what Indian bourgeoisie will do with creative people’s ass and what they will do with bourgeoisie. ?  Bourgeoisie’s conservative movement has threatened all kinds sublime values.  I personally guess they are  following the fascistic path evolved by Amercan war mongers-American way to fascism. Should we now debate these questions for bourgeoisie good sense : What kind of art is possible under bourgeoisie conservatism? or What kind of literature is possible under bourgeoisie conservatism? 

fuck you prostitutes ! We are now going to analize you, no one else can do it. We are going to fix a beautiful RED CENTER in these two types of bourgeoisie prostitution and chaos.

अथ भगसूत्रम्

स्वभगविमर्शःपुरूषार्थः

मध्येविकासभगानन्दलाभः

एतेनःनित्योदितस्थितिः

rest of it SOON as

“अद्वैतभगसूत्रम्” 

The delight of the urban poet is love—not at first sight, but at last sight. It is a farewell forever which coincides in the poem with the moment of enchantment. Thus the sonnet supplies the figure of shock, indeed of catastrophe. But the nature of the poet’s emotions has been affected as well. What makes his body contract in a tremor—crispé comme un extravagant, Baudelaire says—is not the rapture of a man whose every fiber is suffused with eros; it is, rather, like the kind of sexual shock that can beset a lonely man. The fact that “these verses could only have been written in a big city,” as Thibaudet put it, is not very meaningful. They reveal the stigmata which life in a metropolis inflicts upon love.
–Benjamin in Charles Baudelaire: A Lyric Poet in the Era of
High Capitalism

Philosophically speaking as soon one orients to one’s own discourse one becomes emancipated.  Liberator’s purusarth begins with one’s own self discourse ”स्वविमर्शपुरुषार्थः”.  It is not necessary to put an end to the roots for we certainly can’t do it and no one has ever done it.  Shakespeare’s question that, “Hamlet does not know what to do with all these skulls<of the fathers, forefathers>. But if he abandons them! Will he cease to be himself?” is quite remarkable in this context. What we can do is that we can evolve and take most relevant and useful elements and prevent harmful one.  We can hold on in our hands good humanitarian skulls, merciful and sensitive skulls but not as it is rather we must conjure it in new way according to our spirit and make it the subject of new Gospel. For example religious theology has lost its all validity long ago but many things in it are still interesting, important and can be useful to us in our creative endeavors as I have discovered new meaning of Purusartha. We must think over it pragmatically and develop it in new creative directions-we should evolve new concepts from it. Religious priestly sublimization doesn’t’ satisfy the contemporary souls—a new approach is needed that doesn’t sublimate the desire of the desirous souls rather liberates it in creativity.
I am certainly not talking here to liberate desire according Buddhist, Hindu or Christian pornographic veginal schema  for it can be better liberated in one’s creative endeavors.  Religious priestly sublimization begins with “I’ and it is “I” that losses, discovered and rediscovered each time in each stroke. It has been a sorry state of affair. Subject that was lost in bourgeoisie asso-logy should be retrieved as an object now for the further scandals till communism is reached and it is emancipated as pure SPECIES-BEING. Subject’s Nirvanic accident  in the hole<whole> and its whole imaginary symbolization of the hole <bhag-wan> is no more amorous. We must invent a new amorous   imaginary beyond holo-centrism, asso-centrism and priestly-godly semen-tic flow.

What is Buddhist hole-centric Nirvana if it is not this semen:-
State of warmth – love talks..Eroticized
State of summit –Closeness..Embrace..Kissing..etc.
State of forbearance—PENETRATION..Holding the phallus patiently.
State of supreme light clear light—Samadhi without interval in the hole.
लिप्तालिप्तमतिस् तत्र सुखेन विहरते सद!
Kissing embracing fucking each other roam heavily ever.
This assological sublimation  is  priestly one. Priestly sublimation is truly mercantile type aesthetically backward commodity and unproductive.  How long can the  Buddhist symbolic esoteric story of penis and lotus run? I am sure, Universal Truth doesn’t lie in mother’s vagina, father’s penis and its symbolization of nationalistic tune “Vande Mataram”. We must quickly turn Left by dividing <bhagvatam%> these semen dwellers and mother fuckers. Only this can free us from the priest’s assological-astrological claws. Priestly tyranny that has been promoted by Indian bourgeois has enchained our creative spirit, it is a dangerous sign. Priest-Bourgeoisie unity is a form of despotic mercantilism; it is penetrating people’s ass-es mercilessly. This despotic state of affair has corrupted entire population and now they are struggling to get rid of their soulful corruption by analizing Anna. Anna carries merchant’s semen-tic in his ass and delivering it to the Hindu population. This Hinduttva fascist priest in Gandhi topi is currently active in Uttarakhand with another fascist Ramdeva to promote Hinduttva. Priest-bourgeoisie despotism is a noncreative parasitic apparatus formed of a cluster of  specific non-sensitive class of middle class petty bourgeoisie, these slaves have corrupted our beautiful cosmos  for they posses slave consciousness. They can never get rid of it and they have never done so in entire Indian history. In India, America and elsewhere it is this class from which Zombies are born, the blood sucking crony capitalists emerge and Vampires come into existence.  Undoubtedly this middles class parasites have a kind of will to infiltrate and destroy the society, they have a specific kind of death instinct for they die for the merchant -their master.  We should understand their collectivism, their out side associations for they are global beyond ‘National’ and operate collectively. We must program a new program for their end. We should evolve a new theology of conjuration and exorcism.

If these Zombies die then the center of gravity will be shifted to a new creative direction. Without it liberation is not possible. A kind of apocalyptic vision is needed to settle account with all kinds of drama drama of this middle class petty bourgeoisie.
In TV Sass-Bahu elegant ass-ology of the sweet home of this petty bourgeoisie class  must be thoroughly fucked. Bourgeoisie’s subjective essence is wealth of two kinds—two kinds of श्री i.e. two Gs –Gold and G-spot. Artists , authors and all creative people should target this G-centric bourgeoisie reason, its subject’s radical exercise of power that limits all human endeavors to G. Bourgeoisie subject makes immergence in either of the two Gs.  For example Hindu emergence in G is summarized in this way — When with self-recognition one’s individual powers organs of perception/sensation from 5sense and 5 organs of action to mind, intelligence, chit and ego is dissolved by penetrating into its presiding deities i.e. SRI-G-spot, at that time the light of bliss that arises is like Chandra kala (cold  one) .

I have to quote a line of sanskrit poetry on this G-realization “कुसुम सौरभे भृशं भृंगं एवं रसिको न मक्षिकः” means this cold G-realization is attained by bumble bee not by the flies.
Such bourgeoisie immersion into things, reducing everything into images of the Gs, into their fantasy so that senses could be victorious has failed on all planes of movement- economically we are experiencing great recession because of G-centric immersion. Lacan calls such state imago realization “lamella—, a destructive reason that tries to realize a fictive, illusory world in mirthic environment as Benjamin says phantasmagoria and sacrifices humanity on its alter.  “The disappearance of meaning from everything … means something more primal is called for. With the disappearance of meaning, subjective knowledge and the power to represent too fall away, their blind, illusory truths forcing their disappearance, and what is left is “pure ANAL perception”. Remarkable aspect of all this bourgeoisie sublimization is that it has never been devoid of earth rather it is totally objective <क ख> both Gs are only bare earth. Hindu goddess Parvati’s ass or Sita ass is symbolized as pure earth so religiosity has never been subjective thing, it is all about earth summarized by me in two alphabets <क ख>.

enjoy!
but

editing still going on ….

True Purusartha is the discovery of one’s own creative potentiality, opening up to new universes, new cosmic forces–<”स्वविमर्शपुरुषार्थः”   “one’s own discourse of the self is Purshartha>. This definition of Purushartha is something creative and philosophical and free from  priestly  discourse of the LIMITED SELF to which even Marxists fully agree. Discourse of the self is a creative endeavor which moves unconditionally no doubt with raising  of new questions; it can not move into a priestly structured discourse of the self with conspiratorial concept of FAITH.  Since Purusartha is one’s own discourse of the self therefore it is a purely metaphysical concept that clearly tells us that this movement of the self  is a pure becoming of the being. It is a pure  Difference while religious liberation is a caricature type liberation in black and white and perfectly Boring.  People have no option to cross the priestly defined universes. Every one is liberated  to a defined place <a concept of good place> and if he has to be reborn, he has to be reborn in a defined way in priestly defined and socially-religiously captured ‘yoni’.

Before raising a question or before asking “what is truth” or What is Brahman? so called priests of < ब्रह्मजिज्ञासा > surrender to the  Scripture and say “Truth is written only in Veda..only our book is yoni of TRUTH <शास्त्र योनित्वात > no one’s else”. Veda Vsyasa could never free the possibility of questioning of new questions, he encloses all possibilities with his godly declaration that “Truth is so and so because  Veda says so<शास्त्र योनित्वात > ” All his hermeneutics and logic concerning Brahma Jigyasa and Ultimate Truth is false because he never asked openly like a man of discourse “what is Brahma, or what is truth?” He didn’t ask any question and if he asks it would be already determined by some line or word of scripture; many a times it would be impossible to ascertain its  validity, many a times it would be nonsense and illogical even from priestly point of view.   And this fault was remarked by Adi Sankaracharya who was no doubt a refined man in his commentaries in various places by stating that “Everything coming from Veda is not  word of God and can not be taken as a proof of Brahma, it should be ascertained logically”.

Category of religious faith and godly scriptural emphasis to have faith in written or spoken words is in fact not a faith rather a clever strategy to enslave people.  Faith is a kind of prevention act–prevention of creativity. Priests fear from a creative spirit for a creative spirit will speak new truths, bring new light to the world therefore faith is their politics and conspiracy both to block creativity  and preserve their authority and territory. If we say that Bourgeoisie is illiterate or conservative it is because they too never want creativity and creative people to command the universe, they see creativity as a threat for it deconstructs ..breaks..brings new things into light. “Creativity is causality” therefore in it bourgeoisie sees a hidden threat perception- of a possibility of a new world.  Bourgeoisie demands productivity, Not creativity. Not creative people rather productive people-slaves . Only a creative man endeavors  for a new God in the same way as ancient Rigvedic poets  raise questions about the authenticity and potentiality of existing  gods like Indra by saying <कस्मैदेवाय हविषा विधेम >..

Till I come with new blog post meditate on this priestly universal confusion… <Mulaadhar has no four petal or eight or some say sixteen rather this big scholar priest of 16th century says it has thousand petals…Sahasrasara is not only above it is also in anus.सहस्र दल कमलं द्वयं सर्वकमला नामधार भूतं उर्ध्व मेकंपद्मं मुलाधार अधिष्ठति> LOZ THOUSAND FLOWERINGS IN ANUS.:-)

“The whole of what is called world history, says Marx, “is nothing but the creation of man …the emergence of nature for man; he therefore has the evident and irrefutable proof of his self-creation of his own origins–Marx”

In this historical and collective process of fixation, collecting plays a certain role. Collecting is a form of practical memory, and of all the profane manifestations of the penetration of “what has been” (of all the profane manifestations of “nearness”) it is the most binding. Thus, in a certain sense, the smallest act of political reflection makes for an epoch in the antiques business. ~construct here an alarm clock that rouses the kitsch of the previous century to “assembly.” This genuine liberation from an epoch has the structure of awakening in the following respect as well: it is entirely ruled by cunning. For awakening operates with Cunning. Only with cunning, not without it, can we work free of the realm of dream. But there is also a false liberation. Whose sign is violence? Here, too, that law prevails by which the exertion brings about its opposite. This fruitless exertion is represented, for the period in question here, represented by Jugendstil

Dialectical structure of awakening: Remembering and awaking are most intimately related.  Awakening is namely the dialectical, Copernican turn of remembrance. It is an eminently composed reversal from the world of dreaming to the world of waking. For the dialectical schematism at the core of this physiological process, the Chinese have found, in their fairy tales and novellas the most radical expression. The new, dialectical method of doing history teaches us to pass in spirit-with the rapidity and intensity of dreams- through what has been, in order to experience the present as waking world, a world to According to which every dream at last refers.

Buddhist monks were watching all this and they created their own Kuber and said “FUCK YOU GANESH “..gold and capital is ours ..LAXMI is ours. We will fuck Laxmi in monasteries.

                                                                           Buddhist kuber trampling Ganesh

Meanwhile Marx was watching all this holy exploitation from heaven and called his messengers Lenin and Mao to take take over these bastards ..”take away all gold and capital from the bourgeoisie and distribute it to masses..”

Actually “G”anesh not only presides over Gold but also on the “G”SPOT of women. I think now that  this big bellied bastard it none other than priest and the merchant fucking all around. If Buddhst Kuber temples this Gana of bourgeoisie presiding over both G’s it was no less revolution those days. Religion is non other than this G. Hence Turning the “G”means turning the wheel of Kalchakra and turning the three “G-s” means turning the Marxsian wheel..universal movement of human emancipation.

Friends! what are the three “G-s” …<God-Gold-G spot.> deconstruct this tripartite now.:-)